Previously: romans 14 chiastic structure
“We then who are strong ought to bear with the scruples of the weak, and not to please ourselves.” Rom 15:1
“Therefore receive one another, just as Christ also received us, to the glory of God.” Rom 15:7
“Receive one who is weak in the faith, but not to disputes over doubtful things. For one believes he may eat all things, but he who is weak eats only vegetables. Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him.” Rom 14:1-3
He began his discourse on receiving one another, both the strong and the weak, in these verses, and spent chapter 14 explaining his reasoning, then in chapter 15, he is concluding his discourse.
Back to chapter 14: The one who believes he may eat all things, we can infer is the strong, because the weak eats only vegetables. We saw that Paul defines “all things” for us later in the chapter (remember he is answering a specific question the Romans asked him, and we do not know what the question was, but Paul is assuming that they do, therefore he does not restate the question or explain what his topic is for our benefit. We have to do some detective work to not misunderstand him).
All things means eating vegetables AND meat (Rom 14:21; it is the eating of meat that is causing the weak to stumble). One side of the dispute, the strong side of the dispute, believes they can eat vegetables AND meat (all things), while the other side of the dispute, the weak side of the dispute, believes they can eat vegetables only. The debate was whether eating meat sacrificed to idols constituted idolatry. All the butcher shops in the Empire obtained its meat from animals sacrificed in the temples. The debate was NOT whether pork was now clean for a person to eat. Clean and unclean meat was clearly defined already in Scripture and was not a doubtful thing (Rom 14:1). It was whether clean meat, say lamb, was made unclean and thus unfit to eat because it had been purchased in a butcher shop, i.e. sacrificed in a pagan temple.
Now we saw last time that while most of chapter 14 deals with the meat sacrificed to idols issue, whether that made clean meat unclean, Paul also discussed esteeming days. We saw that one observes “the day” (we are not told which day was in question, it could have been, for example, the day of Easter) since on that day Jesus rose from the dead, in order to honor the Lord. And another does not observe “the day,” (it could have been, for example, the day of Easter –since it is the festival which honors the pagan fertility goddess) — in order to honor the Lord, and to not have anything to do with idolatry in any way, shape, or form.
Both of these questions – which are doubtful things, not clearly explained in Scripture already – have to do with what a believer does in his pagan culture which constitutes idolatry. Paul lumped them together because it was the same kind of question, dealing with the same spiritual principle.
Idolatry comes from the heart. The believer who knows – who has faith – that his heart is pure before God and that he gives no place in it in devotion to idols, is strong. He can eat vegetables AND meat, he can visit his mother’s house on “the day” in order to honor her even though she has the place decked out in eggs and bunnies. The believer who is not fully convinced in his own mind, is weak. He is not sure that eating a lamb chop which has been sacrificed to an idol does not honor that idol, so he eats vegetables only. He is not fully convinced that visiting his mother on “the day” when her house is decked out in eggs and bunnies, is not honoring that idol, so he stays home and observes not “the day” in order to honor the Lord.
Before we misunderstand: the definition of strong is not one who does anything, and the definition of weak is not one who refrains from doing some things. The strong is the one who is fully convinced in his own mind, and the weak is the one who has doubts. I believe the strong have an extra responsibility, not only to not cause others to stumble, but also to be certain that their convictions are firmly rooted in the truth, in Scripture. It is not a crime to be weak. It is not a crime to be unsure because you are still learning, and to know there are some things you don’t know yet. It is not a crime to err on the side of caution. Remember that Daniel ate only vegetables so as not to transgress the dietary commands of Torah, and he is a mighty man of faith (Dan 1, Heb 11:33).
Paul is saying, Hey, receive one another even if your convictions over doubtful things are different. Accept each other, don’t break fellowship or separate from each other and say that group over there (consisting of strong believers) is steeped in idolatry and sin, so they can’t be a part of us; or that group over there (consisting of weak believers) doesn’t have faith and they rely too much on works, so they can’t be a part of us.
Christ is our example. He received us while we were still sinners and as ignorant of His Word and His ways as the day is long. With open arms! The Greek word “receive” is Strong’s G4355, proslambano, to take to one’s self, as one’s companion, into one’s home, to grant one access to one’s heart, to take into friendship and intercourse! Wow! Let’s extend that reception to each other, Paul is saying, not making divisions and exclusions over doubtful things!
Now, let’s remember this admonition applies to differing personal convictions in issues which are doubtful things. Those things which are clear in Scripture are not doubtful, and Paul chastised the Corinthians, for example, for retaining in fellowship a believer who was having relations with his father’s wife, a clear violation of Scripture (1 Cor 5:1-2).
Continued: romans 16, those who cause divisions